When I was a wee Bunche I used to wonder exactly what the hell monsters
like King Kong and the Creature From the Black Lagoon intended to do
with their female captives once they got them back to a mountaintop
retreat or an underwater cave. Sure, there was obvious lust or
infatuation in play, but it just wasn’t feasible. Kong would have been
thwarted by scale alone, and both he and Blacky faced the stumbling
block of being species altogether other than human. But exploitation
cinema has never been hindered by such considerations as logic,
comparative biology, or even common sense, hence the existence of
HUMANOIDS FROM THE DEEP, a classic bit of nastiness that unflinchingly
depicts the public menace of horny fish-men who graphically rape beach
bunnies in the name of a quick box office buck.
Coming out just two months after the slaughterhouse thrills of the
original FRIDAY THE 13th, HUMANOIDS FROM THE DEEP just barely got in
under the radar and avoided the willy-nilly trimming foisted upon the
majority of horror flicks released not long after in response to the
deluge of gory FRIDAY THE 13th cash-ins. Excising or otherwise neutering
the gore and violence from films such as THE BURNING, HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO
ME, and MY BLOODY VALENTINE robs such fare of its very raison d’etre,
and if such a fate had befallen HUMANOIDS it would have ended up
completely worthless instead of finding itself in the history books as a
landmark of onscreen, tasteless misogyny and what you could once get
away with under the guise of a horror/exploitation picture.
HUMANOIDS tries to be many things at once — a cautionary tale on
tampering with nature, a rumination on racism, a would-be eye-opener on
how badly the Native Americans got the shaft — and fails at everything
it attempts, save for the infamous fish-rapes that are the key reason
anyone saw it at all. Contrary to many reviews you’ll find, it’s quite
slow-moving and absolutely uninvolving, populated as it is with total
non-characters who exist only to deliver trite dialogue, get maimed by
the monsters’ very sharp claws, or end up on the wrong end of a
rock-hard, sea-dwelling cock.
Absolutely
tasteless but then again, horror is NOT always a genteel storytelling
form. I can think of few things that would be more mind-warpingly
horrifying than being stripped naked and sexually assaulted by a priapic
sea monster, so, completely exploitative though it may be, the concept
is certainly valid and brings to mind what H.P. Lovecraft would have
done with DAGON or THE SHADOW OVER INNSMOUTH if he'd made grindhouse
movies in the late 1970's or early 1980's.
The film plods on and on between the mayhem, and when the incredibly
offensive sight of shrieking girls pinned helplessly beneath the
thrusting torsos of Charlie the Tuna’s butt-ugly cousins finally happens
you’ll probably find yourself relieved that the film has finally come
to ultra-sleazy life. And horrifying though it may be in concept, the
fish-rape sequences veer straight into the territory of sheer absurdity
and become somewhat giggle inducing. I’ve seen this film with a few
women I could name, sleaze-fans all, and each one of them burst out in
hysterics at the sight of a guy in a scaly latex getup with overlong
arms and an exposed brain violating refugees from a BEACH PARTY movie.
It’s one thing to read about such goings-on in a story by H.P.
Lovecraft, but it’s another thing entirely to see such material enacted
on a shoestring budget with camerawork that would have been right at
home in a porno entitled SMELLS LIKE FISH Vol. 6.
And, no, we don’t get to actually see the monsters’ fish sticks.
There’s not much story to speak of or care about, so all that remains is
the nasty stuff, and that’s rather entertaining, especially the
all-hell-breaks-loose final ten minutes or so, in which about a dozen of
the monsters crash the town fair — conveniently located at the marina —
and proceed to mutilate or fuck everyone in sight.
Just
let these motherfuckers try this shit at Coney Island. They'd be part
of the new fish & and chips meal at Nathan's in a heartbeat!
It’s balls-out insane and once the smoke clears and all seems right in
the world, the scene shifts to one of the fish-men’s victims about to
give birth to a half-fish baby. The mother, now yellow-eyed thanks her
trauma (?), howls and screams as her baby does a move straight out of
the vastly superior ALIEN (1979) and rips its way straight up through
her totally fake and greasy-looking belly, revealing itself to be a
cheesy Muppet knockoff slathered with taco sauce.
There’s an interesting story about the making of this film that claims
director Barbara Peters was outraged to discover that infamous producer
Roger Corman added the graphic rape scenes after the film was completed,
totally without her knowledge. That kind of move from Corman wouldn’t
surprise me in the least, but I’ve also read that makeup artist Rob
Bottin — who also did stunning work in THE HOWLING and John Carpenter’s
THE THING — has gone on record stating that he was one of the humping
fish-men and his scenes were shot with Peters behind the camera, so it
sounds like a classic case of backpedaling to me…
In short, HUMANOIDS FROM THE DEEP is completely fucking stupid and very
dull, but the potent (pun intended) sleaze aspect makes it worth sitting
through at least once, especially in a roomful of equally liquored-up
and like-minded friends of cinematic crud. TRUST YER BUNCHE and have the
Fast Forward button at the ready for when the prurient bits aren’t
happening.
Poster from the original theatrical release.






No comments:
Post a Comment